> > Breaking the system because Arch haven't tested it well enough, or > > released the right information happened atleast three times in the 6 > > months that I used it. > > It only happened one time for me, when they switched from init to > systemd I dropped Arch for perhaps a year. But with Debian and Ubuntu > breaking the system happens several times a year. IMO the testing is > much better for Arch than for any other distro I used.
By broken I guess you mean changes stopped your audio setup working?, interesting. What did you do during that year, try Gentoo or debian/ubuntu? I meant for updates. I have never had to manually intervene to enable successful updates with any other package management system including Sabayon's? Base may go out of sync on OpenBSD but that is perfectly predictable and requires perfectly predictable sudo commands. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130407165122.35edd...@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk
