On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:35:05 -0500 Mark Filipak <markfilipak.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > that, and the > knowledge that, because it's free, people who could help, won't (or > bail out at the first sign of trouble)... and because it's free, > complaints and/or suggestions seem like bitching and no one likes to > listen to someone bitch. >
Think about the other implications of 'free', as opposed to 'paid for'. Think about a company with a very high market share, and it becomes obvious that most of its efforts will go into maintaining that market share, and much of *that* effort will go into maximising incompatibility with other manufacturers. Producing what the customer needs will run a very poor second to maintaining market share. Remember when Windows 7 Beta (I think they called it 'Vista') was actually put up for sale as a full-priced product, because they needed to maintain a market presence, not because it was finished? Debian Stable is released when pretty well all the bugs are out, not on a particular date. Think about software as a business. It's no good if you just buy Windows or Office once. Think about the mandatory rearrangement of the user interface in every new version of Office, concealing the fact that the core features haven't changed in decades (the first version I used was 95, and today I rarely use anything that wasn't in it then, and the original Apple version had pretty much all those features. Microsoft learned how to write the first Windows from writing Office for Apple). All that has really changed are the output possibilities, now PDFs and web pages are produced within Office (and have you ever seen the HTML produced by Office?) and that documents are now XML-based. This isn't just theoretical: I help out in the Microsoft Small Business Server forum (less often now that my Iceweasel won't post to it, nor Konqueror, I need to fire up Midori to get the site to work properly ). I'm not at all impressed by the percentage of peoples' problems which are purely artefacts of Microsoft's marketing policies ('No, that won't work, Server XXXX doesn't work with more than one NIC or with a non-/24 network address,' etc.) There's a lot more to software being free than trouble getting help with it, and in my experience, unless you put up a significant chunk of cash per incident, Microsoft aren't interested in helping you either. The warranties on paid-for software (found one yet?) say all you need to know about the back-up you'll get just because you handed over some money a year or two ago. Oh, and are you happy with the attitudes of Windows software vendors to the ownership of 'your' computer? I just removed a drive-by installation of a McAfee something or other from my Win7 box. I do usually spot these before they happen, and untick the boxes, but I obviously missed one. I've no idea what wanted program it sneaked in on. There's nothing like this in Linux, or at least at the Debian end of Linux. But in the Windows world, the vendors are doing you a big favour by allowing you to give them money, and in return they'll walk all over 'your' computer and invite their friends in for a party. That's probably the single most offensive part of the Windows world, as far as I'm concerned. -- Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130226092635.17583...@jretrading.com