On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:51:17PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > Some people will say that unstable is better for security issues, > because it is harder to exploit flaws when the software changes > constantly.
Really??? They obviously don't understand the meaning of stable. (Hint, it doesn't mean unlikely to crash.) -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130223035558.GF16768@tal
