On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:53:56 -0800 Kelly Clowers <kelly.clow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Celejar <cele...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Huh, look at that - it has a web interface at that address. How on > > earth I was supposed to figure that out is beyond me, but thanks a > > million! [I'm used to routers, which in my experience generally use > > 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.0.1] > > > > It seems to show a lot of information, but I see almost nothing in the > > way of settings. I suppose that if it really has no router > > functionality, and just acts as a simple bridge, there isn't much to > > tune? > > Yeah, it seems they don't want people to know. Glad it worked, though! > Pretty sure one reason they use .100.1 is to avoid stepping on the > toes of home routers, since they are often used together. Makes sense. > As far as settings, I think you have to hack it a bit to do that, if it > is possible at all. It is on some Motos, I know... I guess that part of the problem is that unlike routers, which have basic networking settings that are generally standard and well understood, the cable modem stuff seems to include a lot of highly specialized and arcane settings that aren't meant for the layman. > Cheers, > Kelly Clowers Thanks, Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130123214723.53c59ed2.cele...@gmail.com
