Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > >Most importantly look at the timestamps of the source files and look > >at the current system time. > > > >After a normal copy the time will be the current time. But if cp is > >given the option to preserve the original file attributes then the > >time will be that of the source file. > > The preserve option doesn't explain the UTC vs local time > difference,
I expected that it will match the source file time and that the time listed on the source files are already one timezone different. For whatever reason. > but the OP could use synaptic to take a look at optional > dependencies and to search for all kinds of packages that are even > not suggested or recommended by the dependencies. Searching for > Nautilus by synaptic and comparing installed packages from the > Ubuntu and Debian install might help. I agree that it is an A-B difference and an A-B comparison between the two would eventually lead to the difference. But actually doing that comparison is tedious because there are so many differences. > Some research about Exif vs file timestamps might also lead to a solution. > > I don't know what to do, but IMO the Exif thing seems to be the culprit. Your suggestion is certainly plausible that nautilus changes the timestamp to match the exif timestamp. It makes more sense than my thought of having the files mounted with a different timezone in some way. Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
