On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:20:44 +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:28:43AM +0100, Joseph Jones > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > While I'm a huge Firebird fan, IE was better at some tasks > > (yes, they are non-standard HTML tasks, but what can you do > > when that's what the industry uses? *sigh*). > > > > I've tried Konqueror and found it lacking extremely (yes, I > > love it as a file manager when combined with qvwm, but it > > simply isn't as full-featured as other browsers) and Opera > > seems worse than Firebird. So, can anyone suggest a browser > > that tries to replicate these changes? > > You've tried several of the better ones. > > Personally, I like Galeon 1.2.5 (*not* to be confused with > 1.3+), and use it extensively. Mozilla is another option.
For most of my browsing needs (except when I have to tangle with some serious javascr*), I use emacs-w3m, an emacs "frontend" for w3m with some convenience features like google search <http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/> > Extensive reviews: > > http://twiki.iwethey.org/Main/NixBrowsers Extensive? You didn't have a line for edbrowse (apt-get'able!). It's one of the most unusual browsers I've tried. And you could use it without a computer screen. > Echoing Monique: what MSIE features do you find lacking? Let's see, javascript compliance with browsers that insist on MSIE compliance only. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
