Darac & others,

From:   Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:14:59 +0000
> I was rather meaning how much the signal is attenuated between the
> sender and receiver.

My hypothesis. ...
For the receiver to know the attenuation from the tranmitter, the 
header of each frame would have to contain a number representing the 
transmitted power.  Than assuming the receiver knows the received 
power, it can calculate power attenuation.  Of course, received power 
is not necessarily received information.  In 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame there is no mention of 
transmitted power.  I suppose it might be hidden in a lower layer 
but probably this information and calculation just do not exist.

The header has a frame check sequence and retransmission of a corrupted 
frame can occur.  So the receiver can know how many bad copies 
arrived before a good copy.  That might be incorporated into the 
signal quality calculation.

> However, doing a quick bit of searching suggests that the whole "link
> quality as a percentage" thing is more like voodoo: ...

That was my suspicion.  Thanks for the references.

Regards,                 ... Peter E.



-- 
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
Tel +13606390202  Bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca  http://carnot.yi.org/  
"http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057898.38779.26924@cantor.invalid

Reply via email to