Bob Proulx <b...@proulx.com> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Pascal Hambourg writes:
>> > Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
>> > It appears that the client has a private addresse and the server has a
>> > public address. So I guess that there is a NAT device between them, and
>> > its stateful NAT engine may be the cause of the problem, by deleting
>> > connections from its translation table after a delay of inactivity.
>
> I have seen (and discarded) cheap consumer router boxes that had just
> that problem.  
>
>> Yes, just tried it. The server does not receive anything at all when the
>> client starts retransmitting. I guess that is consistent with the NAT
>> explanation?
>
> I think it is very plausible.


And right you were. Replacing the Cisco DPC3825 with a NetGear CMD31T +
WGR614v9 solved the problem.


Thanks!

   -Nikolaus

-- 
 »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

  PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6  02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hanbm56w....@vostro.rath.org

Reply via email to