On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:50, Magnus von Koeller wrote: > On Thursday 16 October 2003 20:11, Pigeon wrote: > > Just thinking that if it was worth trying with 3.2 instead of 3.3, > > trying with 2.95 - which is what woody uses - would also be > > worthwhile, possibly more so. > > The same thing happens regardless of compiler version - I tried the > Debian packages gcc-3.3 gcc-3.2 and gcc-2.95, all from current > unstable. Maybe I'll just try booting into the new kernel and see if > it gets resolved then. I really, really don't understand this, > though.
I'm also having problems (different, though) compiling the .22 kernel-source package with 3.2. On another box, I successfully built the kernel.org .22 using 3.3.2, so I'm going to try that now. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA "A C program is like a fast dance on a newly waxed dance floor by people carrying razors." Waldi Ravens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
