On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:22:40 +1100 Igor Cicimov <icici...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since /run is meant to replace all temporary filesystems in RAM I > would expect this to be other way around, ie /var/run to be symlinked > to /run. So /run should be a tmpfs and /run/shm and /run/lock part of > it. Also /dev/shm should ne symlinked to /run/shm as well. Can you > post your /etc/fstab and output from 'df -hl' command?
And it's for removable devices. /media will become /run/media/"user". However, you're right, usually there's a softlink in /var/run. Oops, I was mistaken, Ubuntu does have /run too, but not /run/media/"user", they switched to /media/"user". The issue still is, that init is neither systemd nor upstart and a transition will lead to borked systems. Even on hard censored mailing lists like the Arch general, you still read the whole day about failing systems. They don't post all friendly mails if systemd does cause issues and I got mail from a member who completely is banned from the list. Don use a rolling release or something experimental at the moment. Use pure init now or install a distro that is ready with the transition to upstart or systemd and be aware that after a switch there will be issues. On Ubuntu you have a mix of "service" and "/init.d", on Arch they drop packages that don't provide "service" thingies. How do they handle this for Mint and Debian Sid? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121116053844.67494524@qrc
