acroread acroread-debian-files acroread-escript acroread-plugins ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk ia32-libs-xulrunner lib32v4l-0 mozilla-acroread nspluginwrapper softmaker-office-2012
Now why would a 'dist-upgrade' want to do such a thing? Then there's this: 'apt-get -u upgrade' The following packages have been kept back: ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk libv4l-0 libv4lconvert0 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. So since I don't have 'aptitude or aptitude-common' installed, why is apt-get trying to remove all my non-free programs? Does it need to remove the non-free stuff before it can upgrade ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk? (for weeks on any 'dist-upgrade' these two ia32 packages have been 'kept back' without apt-get wanting to remove the non-free software, until now. Can anyone interpret what's going on? Debian has always got along pretty well with the non-free world, and it should because it's not going away, and the free software movement cannot be all things to all users. -- CK System Information GTK+ 2.24.10 / GLib 2.32.4 Locale: en_US.UTF-8 (charset: UTF-8) Operating System: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (x86_64) Debian unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/agfn79f8l9...@mid.individual.net
