John Hasler <jhas...@newsguy.com> writes: > lee writes: >> is it a bug that should be reported when a source package doesn't >> compile? > > Yes. > >> And how come that there is a binary package though it cannot be >> compiled? > > It compiled on the developer's machine and on the buildds. Most likely > one or more of the dependencies is not sufficiently strict. > > I assume you mean "cd dvbcut-0.5.4+svn178". The build fails here as > well. File a FTBS bug.
Thank you for trying! Yes, I have the same version here. I've sent a bug report, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691682 Do you have packages from dmo installed? It seems as if that may cause the problem. Since I only wanted to see if compiling it with "-march=native" makes a difference, it doesn't really matter. If I could compile cinelerra or had an alternative for that, I could remove the dmo packages again ... -- Debian testing iad96 brokenarch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ip9uo7oj....@yun.yagibdah.de
