Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> writes: > Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee: >> >> Adobe says on their website: "Flash Player 11.2 is the last supported >> Flash Player version for Linux. Adobe will continue to provide security >> updates."[1] >> >> What's that supposed to mean? Will we soon have to go without flash >> when that version becomes incompatible, unless we use chromium? > > Well I think it means exactly what is stated there: > > There will be security updates and thats it. > > What is to difficult to parse with that sentence?
It can mean that they will make new versions for other OSs. > My take: The sooner it breaks the better. It's not that easy because when it breaks, it means that there's a lot of videos you can't watch anymore. First convert all the videos and change all websites as needed, then it doesn't matter if flash breaks or not, and we can be happy that it finally disappeared if it's replaced with something better. They might come up with something worse, that's what they usually do. -- Debian testing amd64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/876274g070....@yun.yagibdah.de
