On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:07:47PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 06:49:45PM +0200, Veljko wrote: > > a) backup (backup server for several dedicated (mainly) web servers). > > It will contain incremental backups, so only first running will take a > > lot of time, rsnapshot > > Best avoid rsnapshot. Use (at least) rdiff-backup instead, which is nearly > a drop-in replacement (but scales); or consider something like bup or obnam > instead.
Any particular reason for avoiding rsnapshot? What are advantages of using rdiff-backup or obnam? Regards, Veljko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
