On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsut...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/09/12 09:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:41 +0200, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >>> On 04/09/12 21:43, Jon Dowland wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes, pulseaudio needs ALSA. Note that pulseaudio is bad programmed >>>> >>>> That's certainly an opinion, and perhaps a commonly-repeated one, but >>>> an opinion non-the-less. >>>> >>> +1 - I'm with Jon on this one. >> >> That's not an opinion. 1. The way how volumes are adjusted is insane, I >> already explained it in another thread. 2. Pulseaudio does expect >> information from ALSA drivers, they often can't give, so ALSA drivers >> that are working without pulseaudio, won't work with pulseaudio. Seems >> to be related to "1.". 3. Multi-Channel IO cards needed for DAWs can't >> be used. So at least making PA a hard dependency for a DE is bad. Here >> we call this "facts", not an opinion. > > I would still call those opinions related to possibly missing features or > about certain features present, it still doesn't mean it is badly > programmed. > > In my humble opinion you should probably at least file relevant bug reports > or feature requests so as to act in a proactive manner, instead of just > stating that something is bad[ly] programmed.
Ralf tends to confuse his opinions with technical facts... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SzLSZKi4pohbP15mG-CT8S8fGCzs__LH+z=tmbcspp...@mail.gmail.com
