On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:24:42 +0200, lee wrote: > Sid is stable?
Dude... what a question for a user running testing :-) Sid is the codename for unstable. > I want to run testing and not stable, and shouldn't the > packages in testing not be newer than the ones in Sid? Sid has the most updated verions of the packages. > And if the packages in testing should be more recent than the ones in > stable, then why downgrade them to older versions? I think you need more reading on Debian available versions :-P > Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental > because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble ones > are. I would want to keep those until testing catches up. Then this can be the culprit for all your mess unless you had configure apt repositories priorities properly. > ,---- > | lee@yun:~$ LANG=C apt-cache policy (...) What the hell is all that bunch of repositories? :-O You need an urgent reorganization for your repos and also reducing the number of them as you have too many defined. > While (unsuccessfully) trying to use more recent NVIDIA drivers because > with the ones from testing the X-session randomly froze, I added the > i386 architecture because that was recommended. I'm not so sure if that > was a good idea ... Fortunately, the freezing problem seems to have been > fixed :) At a high cost, I'd say... > BTW, what is the Debian way of specifying different locales for > different users? That will depend on the DE you're on (or if you're on none). There's more info on locales here: http://wiki.debian.org/Locale Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1vps8$tli$4...@ger.gmane.org
