On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:46:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > This might be important for the OP too: > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 20:01 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> Ralf, I don't know why is that you don't want to give your points about >> ClamAV, but saying "I don't like for several resons" and "ClamAV was >> unreliable here..." without providing more data that proves the above, >> well, I will have to take it as your "personal" POV and nothing more. > > Virus detection most of the times was better using AVIRA.
That something be better for you does not make the rest "worst" nor "unreliable" per se, that's why I asked for some facts that prove your claims. And as I already mentioned, the only "but" for ClamAV was its accuracy for detecting malware. > AVIRA was more stable and had a better for free support, perhaps AVIRA > simply had more money and a longer time experience, than Sourcefire, > dunno. Again, YMMV, it's just what I experienced. What details are > missing? I don't have statistics. (...) It's okay Ralf, but I did not ask for you experience with AVIRA (and I would review its current licence, just in case...) nor another AV, I was only perplexed about your comments and bad experiences with ClamAV and I'm perplexed because I never heard neither experinced by myself for a ClamAV behaving as bad as you mention. Greteings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrte1c$8av$1...@dough.gmane.org
