On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 15:41 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 18:45 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote: >>>> >>>> AppArmor doesn’t add a single thread to a running Linux system. >>> >>> So it's a voodoo-ghost and doesn't need resources? >> >> If you think that it's using a thread, please show it! >> >> (I don't care either way...) > > Ok, but it's included and has some impact. To be fair, I don't notice > any performance differences with and without it.
You'd probably have to compile a kernel without apparmor support to see a difference. Whether the difference'd be human-detectable's probably up for debate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SyYwaO+ECzy17PKC-djppg-4Pj=1v5qmxr82s7ip+h...@mail.gmail.com
