08.06.2012, 17:41, "John A. Sullivan III" <jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com>:
> I find there are other advantages to VServer. We use both KVM and > VServer in our environment on hefty hardware. Not only do the lower > requirements make a difference on highly virtualized systems (nothing > like seeing dozens of small servers running in 8MB of RAM) but there are > interesting advantages that can be gained from the shared file system > and the ability to remount portions of the host file system into the > guests. > > So we certainly see the need for both. The VServer team is incredibly > talented and helpful but also very small so we are keeping our eyes > closely on LXC. I'm just a little concerned about the userland tools. > I had heard there was talk if util-vserver supporting LXC but I do not > know how far that integration has gotten - John > I'm checking LXC right now, so far big chunk of functionality is missing for me. I can't find a way to share IP address with the host system. Here is my use cases: 1) I have bgpd running on a host server which advertises 10.7.7.5/32 10.6.6.5/32 Then I tell linux-vserver to have these IPs on eth0, eth1 whatever, and I don't need to create routes, nat, etc - packets reach the instance. 2) I have 192.168.1.2/28 and 3ffe::2/120 on the eth0 from a hoster, from there I create containers with 192.168.1.3/32 and 3ffe::3/128 which are attached to eth0 - packets reach the instance. Unfortunately I can't have such setup with LXC. If one is aware what to do, please tell me. Another question, is there a 'unofficial' linux-vserver debian repo for wheezy? If not, how it hard to have personal automated kernel build farm? Any ready to use solutions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/24921339171...@web20e.yandex.ru
