On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Miles Bader <[email protected]> wrote:
> Scott Ferguson <[email protected]> writes:
>>>> You can't disable the code signing requirement on ARM.
>>>
>>> ... which is a great deal more worrying.
>>
>> Yes. And no.
>> I'd hate to see a situation where it was impossible to buy an ARM (or
>> other CPU based board) without UEFI that can be disabled - but I support
>> devices that can be made to *only* run signed code *provided* MS is
>> *not* the certificate agency.
>
> Would that mean anybody who wants to build their own kernel would need
> to buy a signing key?

Not at all.  You can generate your own key and load it into your UEFI.
 It's no different a situation than using self-signed ssl certs
without buying one from a certificate authority.  There's no need to
pay any money to anyone to use the secure boot feature.  Is it a
hassle?  Sure, but you're not beholden to any 3rd party regardless.

-- 
Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caoevnyts_avjvs-2bkaka5aacblnat4cp0m_ax9y3c2jnmn...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to