On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:26:55 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote: > Hello Camaleón, > > Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Microsoft (I can't tell for the rest of the hardware manufacturers >> because their position is not mentioned in detail in the blog post) is >> forcing a needing for something I (and I guess others) _don't need_, >> like TPM modules, using a password in GRUB2, using encryption nor >> signing for safe code. > > If you don’t need that, you can disable secure boot and be happy.
I won't be happy seeing my distribution going towards the steps of another company just becasue it has the majority of the OS desktop market share, whatever that company is named. > However, I welcome the fact that attacks on Windows will be made more > difficult, since that also means smaller botnets, fewer vulnerable > computers etc. That's the problem: we don't have to care about Windows security, it's not our business! That's a problem for the Windows users not for us. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jqlgj6$60h$1...@dough.gmane.org
