On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:42:58 +0900, Hiroki Horiuchi wrote: > I know at least GFDL documents are not `free' in DFSG. In this respect, > `free' in DFSG is narrower than the one in GNU. Is there any reverse > case?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_Free_Software_Guidelines#GFDL If by "reverse" you mean a case sample of we being less restrictive, well, the fact of having "contrib" and "non-oss" repositories available for packages that don't comply with the FSF and even with our own guidelines is a good signal that demonstrate an openness outlook. Anyway, you can also query about this at debian-legal mailing list: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/ Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2012.05.31.15.00...@gmail.com
