On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:11:08 -0700, Peter Easthope wrote: > On 25/05/12 09:49 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> Running testing is not a guaratee for having the latest versions of the >> programs, you have to check by your own, for instance, Wheezy has >> Icewasel 10.0 while Firefox is now 12 (so you can still test with >> Firefox 12 -download and run- and see what happens) and the same can >> happen with the flash player plugin, you can verify what version are >> you running from > > OK, I should have compared the outputs from dpkg -l more thoroughly. For > example, > peter@dalton:~$ dpkg -l iceweasel | grep ice > ii iceweasel 12.0-7~bpo60+1 Web browser based on Firefox > > whereas, > peter@armada:~$ dpkg -l iceweasel | grep ice > rc iceweasel 3.5.16-15 Web browser based on Firefox .
Are you _still_ running 3.5.x? :-O Wow... and you wonder why it closes in some sites? Update that legacy piece of code, sir. And don't be afraid, as I said, I'm _still_ using Lenny (oldstable) with Firefox 12 and life goes its way, flawlessly (I mean, Firefox seems to run smoothly with old distributions). > Also I'd forgotten about, > peter@dalton:~$ grep back /etc/apt/sources.list deb > http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main deb > http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release > > and there are no such entries in armada. After these lines are added to > armada:/etc/apt/sources.list, aptitude declines to update iceweasel > claiming that the source is untrusted. Months back I must have "fixed" > aptitude configuration in dalton to allow "untrusted sources" and > forgotten about "that little detail". Is there a straightforward way to > deal with this? Instructions for using those repos are detailed here: http://mozilla.debian.net/ Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
