On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:05:15 +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 14:53 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:39:01 +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: >> >> > I have 2 identical Wheezy machines: they both have the same packages >> > and the same versions for those packages Wheezy, up to date as of >> > this morning). The configuration files in /etc/cups and /etc/foomatic >> > are exactly identical. Both machines should print to a network >> > printer (HP2200 DTN). I use Cups and Foomatic, and the recommended >> > "HP LaserJet 2200 Foomatic/lj5gray" driver (the postscript driver has >> > the same behaviour). >> >> Are you sure that's the recommended driver for your device? The printer >> seems to support PS as well as PCL6 so using lj5gray can make the job >> output slower and has less options available to configure :-?
> It is the driver that the GUI says that it is the default. GUIs can lie... I mean, they try to do their best but often they offer to the user what they have, not what's the best. > And I am not sure, but I seem to remember that it used to be PS that > was the default. A postscript printer will be happier with a postcript driver though in linux you will experience a noticeable delay when using a PS driver for printing complex documents. > Anyway, with PS I have the same problem. I suspect that some machine >-dependent file is not correct. I have compared (the size of) the files > on both disks that are in the deb files and they seem to be the same. Have you tried by converting the PDF file to a PS? And what happens with a different PDF file or the error happens with *any* PDF file? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jpo7sq$4v3$1...@dough.gmane.org
