On Thu, 24 May 2012 22:18:26 +0200, steef wrote: > Camaleón wrote: >> On Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:46 -0400, Celejar wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón<noela...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >> >> (...) >> >>>> I always avoid Canon devices as much as I can but if there's no >>>> option... >>> >>> I'm not very happy with my MP-240:
(...) >> Yes, that's the kind of things I have read from Canon users, at least >> when you want to get the device working in Linux and despite the good >> or bad quality of their products (which I won't comment about) the >> worst IMO is the lack/bad support from this manufacturer to Linux and >> for that reason it has been completely ditched from my list of possible >> candidates when I look for new hardware ;-( >> > after all I have read now I should have bought another printer if this > one was not given to me. we got a dutch proverb that says: 'do not look > a given horse into the mouth'. In Spanish we have the same saying: "a caballo regalado no le mires el dentado". > so: i will try out this machine whatever happens. Of course, in your situation I'd do the same. > i see it as a challenge. if it does not work i buy myself a decent hp > -printer with the proverbial (?) good support. The printer has been reported to work, at least in Ubuntu, so, as a wise elf female said once: "there is still hope" :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jpo2ih$4v3$4...@dough.gmane.org
