On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will >> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-) > > AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty.
What is what you understand by "dirty"? I can send the same spam, virus-inside or crap message with a signature or without it. That changes nothing. > So it's secure that nobody add a word, removed a word or completely > edited the message. This might be a kind of security some people wish > to have. You can still get false-positives that make the signature cannot be properly verified so you think the message is not legitimate while it is. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/joejm2$bci$1...@dough.gmane.org
