On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:05:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> 08.05.2012 15:03, Indulekha kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:00:16PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> > 08.05.2012 14:57, Indulekha kirjoitti:
> >>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen
> >>>> wrote: 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
> >>>>>>> Indulekha:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete
> >>>>>>>> configuration....
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is inline vs. MIME:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> J.
> >>>>
> >>>> And that page forgets the problems in MIME.
> >>>>
> >>>> PGP/MIME requires headers, message and the signature.asc to
> >>>> be verified. Some mailing list programs mess up with the
> >>>> headers and this way make PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
> >>>>
> >>>> In INLINE, the signature is in message and it doesn't require
> >>>> headers to be verified so it's harder to be messed up by
> >>>> mailing list software.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, all I know is that Jochen Spieker is able to use it
> >>>> without being intrusive.... Maybe you should try to follow
> >>>> his example? :)
> >
> > If I used PGP/MIME, my signatures couldn't be verified on Ubuntu
> > mailing lists (I am on 5 of them if I recall correctly), nor
> > Enigmail mailing list nor gnupg-user mailing lists nor many
> > others. This is small list of those MLs, which I mean with
> > http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/Clearsigning.html .
> >
> >
> > I see... so the people on the *proper* msiling lists will just
> > have to suffer then, eh? :\
> >
>
> I don't understand how those other mailing lists are inproper.
>
> - --
> Mika Suomalainen
> gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728
> Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
> http://mkaysi.github.com/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPqQwIAAoJEE21PP6CpGcoywsQAJFAS+ETF3pUJ1ml1WpadKa/
> 9KTR0+AWJ3SDb4Y3p7/NqfbqwvKPlpnf21NS9u5eHyBAs0tBPh0a4LsV6Ij7X/kM
> w8a9uMASQM3YGepbdNZov16LqEGk03XXbj27bfZ6WT+hojM5IettDgMAs7mel4Mv
> T0hSq9qZJIFvuC6TlxgCELubGezcOk8d++iHVY20UbPA13WDCvzoaurPLoAOdHIx
> X+bE+PSK3wxHAvXFRQ2Q6yS8mTPExq6Xb6c0XiYbqBmPJYsxUuQJKDU4N80zPeVN
> 8nA8LxcqiGtmYuqhly3NDGRbLDJqdtrJojCAgD0xlP8nFu/VIDQNRM8GV3H/NmNh
> LkYZsVtIBQ4tHlZegolGqx8bSK6Ai/WCSoqdfuZBa53HKF5ZWIXh+JAMBNtSsG5f
> ayArhtZa3ViasvL+aretGdm6CrroLn8bcKPnmWYBMsYBoPDbyPmBOsNGhqEhUDFP
> 9J3z60zmw6BP4QvGYVLCS77/ng2IjaR/P49v3svRf33jmepzfBdepF38oOH4iuvD
> jDOSj5uvbEsY90TiUBLevNekAFu+52BS0VCNOPj3hXumkOfBZAOMqPRUkgJAFGtJ
> vbbRJ2J6J/XOsuAV22YlOBzRzL+vHPEdTlwEmIxt9qODCaO5rr6i28yQ53928wGC
> +kJS9B8BlR/cr5ArnQKv
> =4XGK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
They don't support the considerate version of gpg/pgp.
Now that I know that people using this actually have a choice and
choose to be rude, it does make it rather tempting to set up an
autoresponder and filter to nag them...
--
/\ /\
<\ />
^ caveat utilitor
'v-v'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120508123849.GB10698@radhesyama
