On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:19:42PM +0200, Tuxoholic wrote: > I noticed rsh is not installed, it's linked to > /etc/alternatives/rsh, which is linked to /usr/bin/ssh. > > Calling rsh instead of ssh should avoid file encryption during > transfer, at least that was the intention.
That isn't what will happen. SSH will not allow you to turn off encryption. You may want to specify -O Ciphers=rc4 (or blowfish), both of which are quite fast. > The socket options boost transfer speed quite a lot, I usually have > 65355 buffers on my samba server, using rsync directly I can > increase it some more. Have you tested this with ssh? It seems unlikely to me. -dsr- -- http://randomstring.org/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. You can't fight for freedom by taking away rights. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502135739.gy11...@randomstring.org
