On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:18:28 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 11 apr 12, 17:03:41, Camaleón wrote: >> >> «In the "bottom-posting" style, the reply is appended to a full or >> partial copy of the original message. The name bottom-posting is >> sometimes used for inline-style replies, and indeed the two formats are >> the same when only one point is being replied to.» > ^^^^^^ > >> There's little room for interpretations in the above paragraphs but as >> you seem to disagree with that, I'd like to know what's what you >> read/get from there, just out of curiosity. > > ... which implies there are cases when they are not "the same" :)
IIRC, I said that both styles (and citing me) "share 99% of their features", "are the same in esence" and "both are almost the same" but I Did not recall myself saying they are "equal" or "1:1" :-) You (not "you" but people) can indeed make more divisions for the posting styles, e.g., I've received business related e-mails where the full replied e-mail was attached to the message and AFAIK, this is not covered by none of the main posting styles listed in the Wikipedia article. Still, I would consider such communication uses a top-posting-alike style because in the end you are prioritizing your own reply instead making the content legible for anyone else. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jm6mqt$gu4$3...@dough.gmane.org
