In linux.debian.user, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> wrote: [note: obnoxious superfluous quoting not edited out,for the sake of illustration] > > --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sb, 07 apr 12, 18:52:08, Indulekha wrote: >>=20 >> No downside at all then, eh?=20 > > Mutt used to have a flea (bug) that would incorrectly set=20 > disposition=3Dinline on pgp/mime attachments, but Joey seems to be using a= >=20 > fixed version. > > Unless you went out of your way to include the signature in the reply=20 > there is a bug somewhere that needs to be fixed. > > Kind regards, > Andrei > --=20 > Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic > > --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" > Content-Description: Digital signature > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPhaePAAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pv8wH/jBwOVbpsOpY8C8kIfK6qB/2 > HksLeGTu58WTUAhFX+gUMLwfd1qEeoMzmhFlRTvKWzM+DESum4CmIM+H6ZsT1b8F > PQ5/ftrSIXQNxfvUY6Kr5YmVZSbePmwphZ6QfNuvpf8T2dTD7Mf2PRsznBZLHNMM > aOBEZ9r8NjhJxr0Y/LjejpGt6Ux2GKRNn+yL1exawOgsBnYKbRJl6PJKMkoiPlW1 > lO+1A9i7dLoIy3vsYS0CEcXKB/zoe1A4Rk9ja9yh6jnN2v1C9OzJfWBG+xNXyk0X > s1IErnhtnMNDJyMAZkbybdF3DLn8T5k2iME4/6EO264v4YCg6wb3LI/sRveVJ6g= > =3v4i > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --H4SyuGOnfnj3aJqJ-- > >
What you see is what I get after hitting "reply". Using mutt-patched from stable (1.5.20-9+squeeze2). Will it be better if I build the latest version of mutt from source then? I'd surely rather not wade through all the garbage I currently see when people insist on using those pgp/gpg sigs. -- ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ Indulekha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120411160531.GA9859@radhesyama
