Hi Colin,
so, sumarizing for my situation: it's no use tracking a
unstable 'release' because it just isn't that: a release, and never
will be. It's stabiblity level will vary over time, (for instance
tomorrow somebody might decide to drop linux 2.6.0-test6 in unstable)
while the testing release's stability will increase untill it's
mature enough to become a stable release. (After which testing will
fall back again, I presume, to testing's level of stability.)
Then why not take the logical step, pick a kernel release
(or combination of linux/hurd/*bsd releases), put a name on it,
put it in testing and let it grow to a stable release? This name
sid just confuses things, in my humble opinion.
Sincerely,
Jan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
