On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon 27 Feb 2012 at 11:29:59 -0500, Tom H wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: >> > >> > Quite possibly. But that's the nature of Testing, isn't it? Preventing >> > packages in a good state (like CUPS) from migrating there defeats its >> > purpose. >> >> Why don't you add a comment to the bug stating that you disagree with >> the diversity and let the maintainers decide? > > Sorry, I'm a bit thrown by 'diversity'; I'll assume you mean 'severity'. > There is already one mail expressing that view and I try not to go in > for 'me toos'.
I must've mistyped severity and gmail transformed it... I missed the other mail... I don't understand the "me too". All that I was saying is that since you feel so strongly about the bug's severity, just add a comment to that effect and let the maintainers decide whether to change it. What does that have to do with "me too"?! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SwXqMH=qvscx8zmPQ=v7y_6_sv9tqu8okt9bj4grhh...@mail.gmail.com
