On 31/01/12 18:50, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> root@osrdii:/home/andreas# aptitude upgrade Resolving dependencies...
>  The following NEW packages will be installed: libavcodec53{a}
> libavformat53{a} libavutil-extra-51{a} libpostproc-extra-52{a} 
> libswscale-extra-2{a} libx264-116{a} The following packages will be
> REMOVED: libartsc0{u} libbs2b0{u} libdirac-decoder0{u}
> libggi-target-x{u} libggi2{u} libggiwmh0{u} libggiwmh0-target-x{u}
> libgii1{u} libgii1-target-x{u} mplayer-skin-blue{u} The following
> packages will be upgraded: lame libdrm-intel1 libdrm-radeon1 libdrm2
> libmp3lame0 libxvidcore4 mencoder mplayer 8 packages upgraded, 6
> newly installed, 10 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 10.1 MB
> of archives. After unpacking 12.1 MB will be freed. Do you want to
> continue? [Y/n/?] Y Get:1
<snipped>

That all looked fine... (I didn't mean to over-ride Andrei there).

> 
> Current status: 3 updates [-8]. root@osrdii:/home/andreas# apt-get
> -sf install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree
>  Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0
> to remove and 3 not upgraded.

Kind of redundant now that you've used aptitude to upgrade - if you
hadn't I'd have then asked for the output of "apt-get -s upgrade".
In this case it looks I'd ask for the output of:-
# apt-get -sf dist-upgrade

> root@osrdii:/home/andreas# cat /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin:
> release a=squeeze-backports Pin-Priority: 200
> 
> Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian 
> Pin-Priority: 700
> 
> Package: * Pin: release v=6.0,o=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,
> a=stable,n=squeeze, l=Unofficial Multimedia Packages Pin-Priority:
> 200


I'd probably put squeeze-backports higher than squeeze (stable), or at
least equal. Maybe see what Andrei suggests.

> 
> root@osrdii:/home/andreas#
> 
> So this seems like my issue is not solved yet, but looking into my
> E-mail inbox showed the following interesting thing:
> 
>> From: Gmane Autoauthorizer
>> <auth-a403f8c7ceec3b67033fbc8069ee8...@auth.gmane.org> To:
>> bugs.andreas.glae...@freenet.de Subject: gmane.linux.debian.user:
>> Authorization required Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:44:09 +0100
>> 
>> You have sent a message to be posted on the gmane.linux.debian.user
>> newsgroup.
>> 
>> Before the message is posted on the newsgroup, you have to confirm
>> that you exist.  Just reply to this message, and the message will
>> be posted.
>> 
>> 
>> You have to respond within one week.
>> 
>> -- Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org http://gmane.org/
> 
> I replied to this message, so this question is probably resolved
> now.


Sorry - I have no suggestions there.

> 
>> Gmane has nothing to do with Debian. Likewise Google Groups, New 
>> Generation and various other self-appointed "gateways".
>> 
>> Consider subscribing to the debian mailing lists directly instead
>> of using an unassociated third party.  Gmane offers no advantages
>> over directly subscribing to the list, and all the disadvantages.
>> 
>> Dealing directly with the lists will, amongst other benefits,
>> prevent this breaking of threads that makes it harder for
>> everyone.
>> 
> 
> I really prefer using Gmane to getting all those raw E-mail messages.

You can use the Debian news gateway - you can even just respond directly
to through the archive. eg:- go to:-
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/01/author.html
find yourself:-
bottom of that page
open the relevant thread:-
(notice how there's four threads instead of just one?)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/01/author.html
go to the bottom of the post and click on one of the "Replyto:" links.
In this example you'd be replying to yourself!
But normally you use the "next in thread" links below it to find someone
else's response to you post (that one it the one I'm replying to)
This method will either open a Reply in claws (keeping the thread
intact) or open a prompt from your browsers asking which program to
associate mailto: links with (choose claws).

> There is far too much traffic on that list of yours.


That sounds reasonable - though I'd suggest you consider a different
strategy for dealing with gmane - you have created several different
threads where there should have been just one. Most people manage to use
gmane without that happening - and broken threads creates an extra level
of difficulty which can cause people to decide it's too much hassle to
try and help you.
Perhaps some of the other gmane users can suggest ways for you to keep
track of threads.

The alternative - whereby you only receive emails to questions you posed
is to use the method I outlined above.

Hope that helps.

Cheers

-- 
Iceweasel/Firefox extensions for finding answers to Debian questions:-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/

NOTE: new update available for Debian Buttons
(New button for querying Debian Developer Package):-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/debian-buttons/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f27ba68.7040...@gmail.com

Reply via email to