On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote: >>> >>> Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The >>> possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially mentioned >>> here: >>> >>> Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00009.html >>> >>> And this announcement was not corrected nor modified afterwards (unless >>> I missed something), so I managed the installation on my Lenny systems >>> having in mind such statement which it finally turned out to be not >>> possible :-) >> >> You probably missed >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html >> >> ,---- >> | In the light of these goals and also in consideration of the Debian | >> community's feedback to the release team's initial announcement during | >> the keynote of this year's DebConf in Caceres, Spain, the Release Team | >> has additionally decided to revisit its decision on December 2009 as the >> | proposed freeze date. A new timeline will be announced by the Debian | >> Release Team in early September. >> `---- > > Yup, I did read it, but it does not say a word about the possibility of a > direct jump (lenny → wheezy) nor if the first decission was going to be > retired.
The official upgrade process for Lenny to Squeeze was not as easy as a simple dist-upgrade, and I wonder if Lenny-to-Wheezy would be too difficult to work out. I can't imagine that those with Lenny aren't encouraged to go Lenny-Squeeze-Wheezy. Truth be told, I'd just do a reinstall of Wheezy when the time comes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caldrw3pmpqftasjuhbdu9ec7dh4o3wu1o2ytbitkyi_t0t-...@mail.gmail.com