On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:56:18 -0500, Tom H wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:57:22 -0500, Tom H wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:58:15 +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> With new gdm3 entering testing, >>>>> >>>>> gdm3 has been available in wheezy since time ago... >>>> >>>> That's an unfortunate Debian-induced confusion. >>>> >>>> Squeeze has a GDM that's called "gdm3" and that's version 2.30. >>>> >>>> Since October (AFAIK), sid's had a GDM that's called gdm3 and that's >>>> version 3.0.4. So it must've been dropped into wheezy more recently. >>> >>> Yep, but testing (wheezy) has been using gdm3 (3.x) as the default >>> since long, long time ago. I suppose because gdm (2.x) is going to be >>> dropped in a near future. >> >> [2011-11-08] gdm3 3.0.4-4 MIGRATED to testing (Britney) ... >> [2011-09-24] gdm3 2.30.5-11 MIGRATED to testing (Britney) >> >> from >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdm3.html > > Ah! You're right :-O > > I didn't notice we've been using the older version (2.30) all this time, > maybe because gdm3 3.0.4 and 2.30.5 share a very similar UI and > configuration options.
:) Having gdm be renamed gdm3 when gdm moved from 2.20 to 2.30 wasn't helpful in this context... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sz3gcaz_pwphgfsqkdkivz8g9xcj1pdqagpuxgakuf...@mail.gmail.com
