On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 14:39 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:10:54 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > Everything Camaleón wrote is true, > > Your confirmation is reassuring... > > > e.g. for the default Windows just the buttons are missing, > > You can make them visible by using the gnome-tweak-tools package or > manually editing the configuration file. > > > the right-click still is ok, e.g. using "Activities" is the way to > > break every sane workflow for serious usage, but OTOH it's a game for > > all those people who don't use the computer as a tool, but as a toy. > > I don't pretend to use my computer as a toy nor I think GNOME developers > had that in mind. If you are unable to get used to it, it's okay, but > don't expect other users share your point of view. > > In fact, the more I'm using gnome-shell the quicker I'm getting used to > the new layout. It seems I can live without a static-tree menu to launch > applications afterall. Come on, is not that hard. > > > I'm using fallback mode and I'm still able to restore GNOME 2 ;). > > You've been warned: this will dissapear sooner or later so you can start > looking for a replecement...
We'll see ;). > > > The most serious issue is, that some professional FLOSS apps were > > written for GNOME 2, with GNOME 3 we fall back to an amateur OS > > regarding to some apps. > > I still see many applications that are not integrated well with the new > environment but I also think is a matter of time they start functioning > again. It's wasting manpower to rewrite apps ;). > > Greetings, > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1321202794.4744.50.camel@debian
