Hi all, is there a difference between flashplugin-nonfree and mozilla-flashplugin? As far as I saw, both are using flash-files from adobe.com (identical files but with diffferent names), although mozilla-flashplugin offers additionally configuration options (and packages). But besides this, I could not see any other (technical) difference.
Which one is recommended? Greetings Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
