On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:33:41 +0800, lina wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:09:23 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> >> (...) >> >>> I'm still monitoring this but if this is the "cure" to prevent such >>> errors, are there any expected drawbacks for lowering MTU >>> "system-wide"? >> >> (...) >> >> Mmm, no replies yet... > > Reply: > > Sorry, I do not understand well most what you said even I read three > times.
Ouch! The thread was just about MTU and I asked if it is fine to adjust that value with bonded NICs... > May I ask one thing here, Well, not here, maybe in a new thread, don't you think? Hijacking other's postings is not nice ;-) (editing the subject...) > Last time I tried the icedove but don't know how to set the SMTP for > hotmail one. http://email.about.com/od/accessinghotmail/f/Windows_Live_Hotmail_SMTP_Settings.htm > Is the icedove a good choice (for me) to grab emails from hotmail and > gmail? Yes, why not? :-? > Seems Postfix is "heavy" for me? Postfix is an e-mail server (MTA) not an e-mail client (MUA) like Icedove. It's another kind of beast :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.09.04.12.05...@gmail.com
