Hi, > To each his own. If you're happy with "make deb-pkg", then use it. > I still prefer make-kpkg because of its greater flexibility. (I only > get a headers package if I ask for one, for example. Most of the > time I don't need one.) I also like the ease with which one can > change the kernel version and the kernel revision. Sure, it's always great to have the choice for whatever tool you want :) (e.g. I always need the header package as I got two DKMS-built modules)
> However, regardless of whether you use "make deb-pkg" or make-kpkg, > you may find useful kernel-building information on the above web page. > For example, the hook scripts (zy-symlinks) come in handy for users > of boot loaders that use symbolic links, such as lilo, zipl, etc. > The above page does discuss "make deb-pkg", although it is not the > primary focus. I will definitely read it, thanks. > P.S. Please don't top post. Sorry, I usually don't - I will be more careful in the future. Kind regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109021047.24284.ralfjun...@gmx.de
