On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:18:35 -0400 shawn wilson <ag4ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand what is hard about this. I mean if you don't care > about security, just make sure the mount has a umask of 770 (or > whatever) and make an export, reload exports, and mount it from > wherever you want. > > What am I missing? I believe you're missing the point that the user isn't using NFS - this isn't shared files over a network, it's shared files over a shared disk. And a mask of 770 only means that it will preserve other permissions AFAIK - it won't set them. > Also, if you want to call osx Unix, call it broken unix. Most people > say its 'unix like' though. What I mean is that Apple changed basic > unix commands around which osx not act right. And then it is possibly > closer in comparison to windows than it is to Linux. I would agree that it is broken Unix, the point was just to demonstrate that a solution has been implemented somewhere else, and that it should be possible. I disagree that OSX is closer to windows than linux. The small amount of unix it inherits from darwin makes it orders of magnitude more robust than 'doze :). -- rbmj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110829102410.7deb8...@blairasus.mason.homeunix.org
