> > There should be none. > > Note, however, that /dev/mapper/ may contain non-LVM specials as > well, such as cryptsetup(8) ones. > > My guess is that /dev/VG/LV may provide some sort of backwards > compatibility, as LVM may have been implemented before Linux's > “device mapper.” (IIRC, there was an LVM implementation for > HP-UX, bearing some similarity to the one currently in Linux.) > > Thanks for sharing that info. AndrewM, thanks for the prompt reply. -- Kind regards, Yudi
- LVM question: what's the difference between /dev/mapper/v... yudi v
- Re: LVM question: what's the difference between /dev... Andrew McGlashan
- Re: LVM question: what's the difference between /dev... Ivan Shmakov
- Re: LVM question: what's the difference between ... yudi v