2011/8/19 Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com>: > On 20/08/11 03:50, consul tores wrote: >> 2011/8/18 Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com>: >>> On 19/08/11 04:01, Paul E Condon wrote: >>>> I'm curious about the differences between noscript and notscript. > > <snipped> > >>> >> >> Some people think that both, could be a security risk, because they >> run under java, Is not it? >> >> > Wow! You don't half like to load and sophist-i-cate a question do you? :-D
I do not understand what you say, but it could be assumed as a joke, by convenience. > Noscript does not run "under" Java. Well, If you say that, I can not confirm it, but read this: http://adblockplus.org/blog/attention-noscript-users http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/05/01/236248/NoScript-Adds-Subscriptions-To-Adblock-Plus http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=126 I am not a programer, then i trust Debian developers and maintainers, but it reading information some things seem real. > People *can* be a security risk, but not necessarily because they run > under java. > > I would not trust people who ran under flash. > > Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFxkjq=dh7vazuqkg4-2lco3ae1a0sxp8oiwothbt2gcnwp...@mail.gmail.com
