>>>>> lina <lina.lastn...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…]
>> $ sed -e 's/^\(\s*\w\+\s\+[^0-9[:blank:]]\+\)\([[:digit:]]\+\)/\1 \2/' \
>> | sort -nk 3,3 -k1,1 \
>> | sed -e 's/^\(\s*\w\+\s\+[^0-9[:blank:]]\+\)\s\([[:digit:]]\+\)/\1\2/'
> Thanks, but there is another problem here, about the first field,
> which I wish it can be consequentially (mainly keep it present
> sequential), Here is the list, a bit longer,
Somehow, I've had the -k options order reversed in the code
above. It should've read: … | sort -n -k 1,1 -k 3,3 | …
instead.
Note that there we're sorting numerically on the first field,
too. If that's undesirable, sort(1) is to be invoked twice,
like: … | sort -n -k 3,3 | sort -s -k 1,1 | ….
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86hb68p86t....@gray.siamics.net
