On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:10:10 +0200, Tuxoholic wrote:
>> Von: Camaleón <noela...@xxxxx.xxx>
>> > SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", ATTRS{idVendor}=="046d",
>> > ATTRS{idProduct}=="08a2", Name="video%n"
>>
>> Why "video%n"? Why not using a fixed name for each Logitech webcam?
>>
>> Just curious O:-)
>>
>>
> What do you mean ? - SYMLINK+="webcam%n" ? I tried that, didn't help.
Nope.
I wanted to know why you used Name="video%n" instead Name="video1" and
Name="video2" in two separate rules/lines.
> The reactived source explains the use of regular expressions in node
> names:
>
> KERNEL=="fd[0-9]*"
>
> But SYMLINK+="webcam[1-2]*" produced bogus device nodes - unusable. I
> also tried the bracket expression without the wildcard. It looks like
> udev no longer works this way?
>
> One more source [1] explained udev rules with identical usb devices like
> this:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", KERNELS=="1-1", \
> SYMLINK+="webcam1"
> SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", KERNELS=="1-2", \
> SYMLINK+="webcam2"
>
> I changed the usb path to my needs, but this syntax is no longer
> working?
I don't follow you here. I was not talking about that :-)
>> Have you tried to enforce the permissions of the webcams
>> (owner/group/mode)?
>>
>>
> I tried to force GROUP="video" but didn't help.
What did you put and what did you get?
> Anymore ideas? Should I change the level to sth higher than
> 10-xxxx.rule?
I don't see why :-?
> Is it worth filing a bug report against udev?
I would run more tests before ;-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.07.14.14.49...@gmail.com
