On 4 July 2011 21:32, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:24:38 +0000, Alex PADOLY wrote: > >> For a server that works permanently with DEBIAN SQUEEZE, I used LILO in >> kernel compilation and with and scsi isa card. Why many of LINUX >> distribution choose GRUB? I don't know that I must choose. > > I can't tell for LILO but GRUB legacy (which I know better that GRUB 2) Hey, why not use grub2 ? it's shipped with Squeeze , Wheezy , Sid?
> was very poweful... powerful in the meaning of having many options to > diagnose and providing a kind of shell at booting that allowed you to > edit in-place the menu configuration files or find where the vmlinuz > image is to adjust it on the fly if necessary. I have to say that grub 2 is more powerful , as far as I know . it behaves more like *nix software, such as the configuration file,which means we'd better not edit the config of grub directly . And it has the ability to probe other systems in the same hard disk ( though with some bugs to probe correctly the Mandriva/Mageia system) the most important is it is maintained actively, while grub legacy is not maintained anymore . > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.07.04.13.32...@gmail.com > > -- ________________________ Yes, I use Debian GNU/L wolf python london(WPL) Do as you soul should do ! ________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAA4oTHq0Lxutus5rmhV3kX=9_7rNfZARY2ZEhYBW_wuNBB=g...@mail.gmail.com
