On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:18:35 -0400, William Hopkins wrote: > On 06/09/11 at 05:31pm, Camaleón wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:46:54 +0100, Dom wrote: >> > I think that as the wrapper is translating x-terminal options to >> > gnome-terminal equivalents, it shouldn't pass through "-h" or >> > "--help", but should display a basic usage page for the options that >> > *it* accepts. >> > >> > Therefore I consider this to be a bug (albeit minor in nature). I >> > just use the native gnome-terminal options anyway. >> >> I don't know why but something tells me that there must be a good >> reason for the wrapper behaving in that way, differently than the full >> binary. > > Of course. gnome-terminal.wrapper is created solely for > x-terminal-emulator use by gnome-core/gnome-terminal maintainer > Christian Marillat, and it tries to present a set of options more like > xterm, since x-terminal-emulator has decided on xterm-style options. > Emulating a single set of options where conflicts occur is a policy > decision, IIRC.
Ah... then it is intended so no bug here, right? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.11.09.32...@gmail.com