On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:49:21 +0100, Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On (25/09/03 03:49), Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:51:08 +0100, > > Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Given the volume of this stuff that list subscribers are > > > receiving, is a good solution? ie. Do those more experienced > > > among you rate it? > > > > .chances are most people will want an automatic tool like > > 'preconnect mailfilter in ~/.fetchmailrc' for the bulk of the job, > > and smm for the tweak jobs, checking their mailfilter rules, metered > > dial-up's is usually metered by the _time_ spent online and not by > > bandwidth usage. Ah! Yes I can see that, I'm on ADSL and didn't > > consider that. > > > > > .my _impression_ is ssm is really a reimplementation of 'mutt \ > > pop3://your.pop3.server.at.your.isp', with a nice gui added. > So are you saying that mutt can allow you to review messages on a > server like smm? ..that is my _impression_, yes. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
