On 20110602_114715, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > One pro-NM argument that I've seen is that dynamic configuration - a > la udev - is the way that a modern OS should function. I don't see why > a server would need dynamic configuration but that's more than likely > the direction that we'll all end up going today or in a century.
Dynamic configuration of servers is a great boon to integrated hardware/software suppliers who want to control their customers' configurations. (What company doesn't want to control its customers?) If not the supplier company, then some political authority. The allowed configurations are/will be stored in the cloud where the customer/sysadmin can't touch them or even know that they exist. A scary paranoid thought. But paranoids can have friends who want to protect them from the knowledge that they are not in control. -- Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110602161810.gc3...@cmpq.lan.gnu
