On Monday 23 May 2011 00:45:34 Robert Holtzman wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Lisi wrote: > > On Monday 16 May 2011 21:18:01 Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > On Lu, 16 mai 11, 20:43:37, Lisi wrote: > > > > Vanilla, and untouched by human hand. Exactly as aptitude/debian set > > > > it up! I have never dared touch my preferences file..... > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/non-free Packages > > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > > Backports,c=non-free > > > > origin backports.debian.org > > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/contrib Packages > > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > > Backports,c=contrib origin backports.debian.org > > > > 200 http://backports.debian.org lenny-backports/main Packages > > > > release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,l=Debian > > > > Backports,c=main origin backports.debian.org > > > > > > backports.d.o has priority 200, while on a squeeze machine it gets only > > > 100. You should inspect /etc/apt/preferences and the contents of > > > /etc/apt/preferences.d/ (if any of these exist). > > > > /etc/apt/preferences exists and /etc/apt/preferences.d/ does not. But I > > am not clear as to the purpose of looking at them? > > > > For what it is worth, /ect/apt/preferences says: > > <quote> > > Package: * > > Pin: release a=lenny-backports > > Pin-Priority: 200 > > </quote> > > It agrees with apt-cache policy. Shouldn't it? > > I seem to remember reaading that the pin-priority for backports > should be 100. That's what "apt-cache policy" shows on my system > (squeeze).
I still don't see where we are going with this, nor why. :-/ Lenny and Squeeze backports obviously do things differently. Hardly surprising!! Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105230933.52673.lisi.re...@gmail.com
