On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 16:24 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 22 May 2011, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 15:08 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > I can only suppose that some package which was also upgraded today > > > (there were various libraries) has affected both kernels. I would put in > > > a bug report but I have no idea where the problem could lie. > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > A list of the packages that were upgraded would help tremendously, but my > > gut > > feeling says udev. There were a couple of RC bugs against udev 169 (check > > the > > BTS) so it would be interesting to know which version you have installed.
> I have udev_169.1. I am almost entirely certain that udev is to blame, but luckily udev 170 has just been uploaded and I would recommend to upgrade to that version. -- .''`. Wolodja Wentland <babi...@gmail.com> : :' : `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC `- 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
